Here's Maggie Gyllenhaal on the red carpet, wearing a blue Dries Van Noten dress.
I think Maggie looks pretty. That's about it.
I mean, the colors are pretty, the painterly print is semi-pretty, and while her make-up is horrendous, it's overall not too much of a disaster of a red carpet appearance, I guess.
...Hmm.. "not too much of a disaster."
*Loses it*
Bitch, this is the Oscars, and you look like you're wearing the first dress handed to you that wasn't offensively ugly.
Couldn't you have looked for just a little while longer? I'm sure you would have found the perfect dress that suited your unconventional beauty while still maintaining a high level of Hollywood glamour.
It's out there, you just have to look for it.
This? Aint it.
*Long sigh*
...To show you how it's done, here's Rachel McAdams clad in Elie Saab:
Now this is what a "somewhat unconventional, painting-printed" red-carpet gown should look like.
Are the colors a little blah? Yeah, sure.
But when your skin is flawless to the point of almost mimicking a fresh white canvas, you can get away with less-than-popping colors.
It looked like a watercolor painting flowing across the red carpet.
And the bodice? To die.
So pretty. So unexpected.
There were no other dresses on that carpet that looked like this one.
She's A-list in my eyes.
But then, I do wear contacts, so feel free to disagree.
Rachel McAdams is definitely my perfect idea of what a non-traditional outstanding dress should look like.
ReplyDelete